A Comparison of Estimation Methods for Dynamic Factor Models of Large Dimensions
Preprint
- 1 March 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The estimation of dynamic factor models for large sets of variables has attracted considerable attention recently, due to the increased availability of large datasets. In this paper we propose a new methodology for estimating factors from large datasets based on state space models, discuss its theoretical properties and compare its performance with that of two alternative estimation approaches based, respectively, on static and dynamic principal components. The new method appears to perform best in recovering the factors in a set of simulation experiments, with static principal components a close second best. Dynamic principal components appear to yield the best fit, but sometimes there are leakages across the common and idiosyncratic components of the series. A similar pattern emerges in an empirical application with a large dataset of US macroeconomic time series.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Principal components at work: the empirical analysis of monetary policy with large data setsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2005
- Determining the Number of Factors in Approximate Factor ModelsEconometrica, 2002
- An automatic leading indicator of economic activity: forecasting GDP growth for European countries*The Econometrics Journal, 2001
- Federal policies and local economies: Europe and the USEuropean Economic Review, 2001
- Dynamic common factors in large cross-sectionsEmpirical Economics, 1996
- A Test for the Number of Factors in an Approximate Factor ModelThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Performance measurement with the arbitrage pricing theoryJournal of Financial Economics, 1986
- Arbitrage, Factor Structure, and Mean-Variance Analysis on Large Asset MarketsEconometrica, 1983
- Time Series: Data Analysis and Theory.Published by JSTOR ,1981
- Consistent Autoregressive Spectral EstimatesThe Annals of Statistics, 1974