Policy Framing and Learning the Lessons from the UK's Foot and Mouth Disease Crisis
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy
- Vol. 22 (2) , 291-306
- https://doi.org/10.1068/c0209s
Abstract
The 2001 foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic cost over £8 billion and wreaked havoc upon the British countryside. The paper examines the institutional response to the crisis and the subsequent inquiries. Drawing on the ‘garbage-can model’ of organisational choice and ideas of ‘policy framing’, it argues that the institutional response to FMD was tightly focused on agricultural interests. Subsequently, a compartmentalised approach to lesson learning has been partial in its coverage. The result is that important lessons, of a more holistic and integrated nature, have been overlooked despite the replacement of the Ministry of Agriculture with a new Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Virus-crisis-institutional Change: the Foot and Mouth Actor Network and the Governance of Rural Affairs in the UKSociologia Ruralis, 2002
- Representing rurality? New Labour and the electoral geography of rural BritainArea, 2002
- Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural PolicyJournal of Rural Studies, 2002
- Business and Political Dimensions in Disaster ManagementJournal of Public Policy, 2000
- Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda SettingJournal of Public Policy, 1998
- Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- A Garbage Can Model of Organizational ChoiceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1972