The association between pain and disability
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 112 (3) , 307-314
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.010
Abstract
A clearer understanding of how pain intensity relates to disability could have important implications for pain treatment goals and definitions of treatment success. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal pain intensity rating (0-10 scale) cutpoints for discriminating disability levels among individuals with work-related car-pal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and low back (LB) injuries, whether these cutpoints differed for these conditions and for different disability measures, and whether the relationship between pain intensity and disability was linear in each injury group. Approximately 3 weeks after filing work injury claims, 2183 workers (1059 CTS; 1124 LB) who still had pain completed pain and disability measures. In the LB group, pain intensity rating categories of 1-4, 5-6, and 7-10 optimally discriminated disability levels for all four disability measures examined. In the CTS group, no pain intensity rating categorization scheme proved superior across all disability measures. For all disability measures examined, the relationship between pain intensity and disability level was linear in the CTS group, but nonlinear in the LB group. Among study participants with work-related back injuries, when pain level was 1-4, a decrease in pain of more than 1-point corresponded to clinically meaningful improvement in functioning, but when pain was rated as 5-10, a 2-point decrease was necessary for clinically meaningful improvement in functioning. The findings indicate that classifying numerical pain ratings into categories corresponding to levels of disability may be useful in establishing treatment goals, but that classification schemes must be validated separately for different pain conditions. (C) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel releaseThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2003
- Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scalePAIN®, 2001
- Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe painPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Outcome Assessments in the Evaluation of Treatment of Spinal DisordersSpine, 2000
- Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: The relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measuresThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1996
- Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instrumentsPain, 1996
- Workers' compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: the validity of self-reported health measures.American Journal of Public Health, 1996
- A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
- Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile Roland scale as a measure of dysfunction in chronic pain patientsPain, 1992
- Comparative Validity of the Sickness Impact Profile and Shorter Scales for Functional Assessment in Low-Back PainSpine, 1986