Neurophysiological Study of Peripheral Neuropathy after High-Dose Paclitaxel
Open Access
- 15 January 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 10 (2) , 461-467
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-0772-03
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if there is a beneficial effect of amifostine in preventing or reducing the neuropathy induced by high-dose paclitaxel. Methods: Breast cancer patients receiving high-dose infusional paclitaxel (725 mg/m2/24 h) in combination with doxorubicin (165 mg/m2/96 h) and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg/2 h; ACT) were studied on two autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant protocols, one with and one without amifostine (740 mg/m2 administered over 10 min before and 12 h after initiation of the paclitaxel infusion). Patients were evaluated before ACT and 20–40 days later with neurological examination, a composite peripheral neuropathy score, peroneal and sural nerve conduction studies, and quantitative sensory testing. Results: There was no significant difference in paclitaxel maximum concentration, systemic clearance, or area under the curve determinations. Narcotic requirement as well as recovery of hematopoietic counts were also similar in subjects with or without amifostine. After ACT was administered, there was a decrease in peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude and sural nerve sensory action potential amplitude, as well as an increase in vibratory and cold detection thresholds. Clinical composite peripheral neuropathy scores were similar despite amifostine treatment; and logarithm to the base 2 ratios post/pre ACT showed no significant effect of amifostine on peroneal nerve compound muscle action potential, sural nerve sensory action potential, vibratory detection thresholds, or cold detection thresholds. All subjects had acroparesthesias and lost their ankle deep-tendon reflexes after administration of ACT. Conclusions: Single high-dose paclitaxel produces predictable clinical and neurophysiological changes so that patients receiving high-dose therapy are ideal subjects to test the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents. Amifostine was ineffective in preventing or reducing the neurotoxicity of high-dose paclitaxel.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Amifostine in the Therapy of Osteosarcoma in Children and AdolescentsJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 2002
- Pharmacologic Study of Paclitaxel Administered With or Without the Cytoprotective Agent Amifostine, and Given as a Single Agent or in Combination With Epirubicin and Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Solid TumorsAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Assessment of amifostine as protection from chemotherapy-induced toxicities after conventional-dose and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumorAnnals of Oncology, 2001
- High-dose paclitaxel in combination with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in patients with high-risk primary and responding metastatic breast carcinoma: toxicity profile, relationship to paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and short-term outcomeBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Phase I-II study of escalating doses of amifostine combined with high-dose cyclophosphamideCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2001
- Peripheral neuropathy from taxol and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: Clinical and electrophysiological studiesAnnals of Neurology, 1994
- Cool, warm, and heat‐pain detection thresholdsNeurology, 1993
- Use of radiation with or without WR-2721 in advanced rectal cancerCancer, 1992
- Analysis of anticancer drugs in biological fluids: determination of taxol with application to clinical pharmacokineticsJournal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 1990
- Taxol produces a predominantly sensory neuropathyNeurology, 1989