Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 47 (3) , 705-720
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700308
Abstract
Drawing on several data sources we-compare elections for governor and United States senator We attempt to explain why governors are somewhat more electorally vulnerable than are senators. We show that voters are more likely to know and have an opinion of their state's chief executive than of their senators. Governors, however, tend to be evaluated less favorably. In addition, voters are more apt to know and vote for a gubernatorial challenger than a Senate challenger, regardless of the challenger's political background or quality. Voter defection rates clearly give senators an advantage over gover nors in getting reelected. We tie these relationships to differences in media coverage of the two offices.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U. S. Senate ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1992
- Challenger Profile and Gubernatorial ElectionsThe Western Political Quarterly, 1992
- Reported versus Actual Vote: There Is a Difference and It MattersLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1992
- Overreporting the Vote in the 1988 Senate Election Study: A Response to WrightLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1992
- Preemptive Fund-raising and Challenger Profile in Senate ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 1991
- Challengers in U. S. Senate ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1989
- Information and Voting in California Senate ElectionsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1989
- PAC Contributions, Lobbying, and RepresentationThe Journal of Politics, 1989
- Press Issue Agendas in the 1982 Congressional and Gubernatorial Election CampaignsThe Journal of Politics, 1984
- Competitiveness of Senate Seats and Voting Behavior in Senate ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1983