Postmarketing surveillance of potentially fatal reactions to oncology drugs: potential utility of two signal-detection algorithms
- 17 November 2004
- journal article
- pharmacoepidemiology and-prescription
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 60 (10) , 747-750
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-004-0834-0
Abstract
Purpose Several data mining algorithms (DMAs) are being studied in hopes of enhancing screening of large post-marketing safety databases for signals of novel adverse events (AEs). The objective of this study was to apply two DMAs to the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database to see whether signals of potentially fatal AEs with cancer drugs might have been identified earlier than with traditional methods. Methods Screening algorithms used for analysis were the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs). Data mining was performed on data from the FDA AERS database. When a signal was identified, it was compared with that in the year in which the event was added to package insert and/or the year a “case series” was published. A recent publication summarizing the time of dissemination of information on potentially fatal AEs to cancer drugs provided the data set for analysis. Results The peer-reviewed published analysis contained 21 drugs and 26 drug–event combinations (DECs) that were considered sufficiently specific for data mining. Twenty-four of the DECs generated a signal of disproportionate reporting with PRRs (6 at 1 year and 16 from 2 years to 18 years prior to either a published “case series” or a package insert change) and 20 with MGPS (3 at 1 year and 11 from 2 years to 16 years prior to either a published “case series” or a package insert change). Two DECs did not signal with either DMA. Conclusion At least one commonly cited DMA generated a signal of disproportionate reporting for 24 of 26 DECs for selected cancer drugs. For 16 DECs, one could conclude that a signal was generated well in advance (≥2 years) of standard techniques in use with at least one DMA. DMAs might be useful in supplementing traditional surveillance strategies with oncology drugs and other drugs with similar features. (i.e., drugs that may be approved on an accelerated basis, are known to have serious toxicity, are administered to patients with substantial and complicated comorbid illness, are not available to the general medical community, and may have a high frequency of “off-label” use).Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dissemination of Information on Potentially Fatal Adverse Drug Reactions for Cancer Drugs From 2000 to 2002: First Results From the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports ProjectJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- A Brief Primer on Automated Signal DetectionAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2003
- Practical pharmacovigilance analysis strategiesPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2002
- Use of Screening Algorithms and Computer Systems to Efficiently Signal Higher-Than-Expected Combinations of Drugs and Events in the US FDA??s Spontaneous Reports DatabaseDrug Safety, 2002
- Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reportsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2001
- A Retrospective Evaluation of a Data Mining Approach to Aid Finding New Adverse Drug Reaction Signals in the WHO International DatabaseDrug Safety, 2000
- Bayesian Data Mining in Large Frequency Tables, with an Application to the FDA Spontaneous Reporting SystemThe American Statistician, 1999