World Review of Laparoscopic Liver Resection—2,804 Patients
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 250 (5) , 831-841
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b0c4df
Abstract
To provide a review of the world literature on laparoscopic liver resection. Initially described for peripheral, benign tumors resected by nonanatomic wedge resections, minimally invasive liver resections are now being performed more frequently, even for larger, malignant tumors located in challenging locations. Although a few small review articles have been reported, a comprehensive review on laparoscopic liver resection has not been published. We conducted a literature search using Pubmed, screening all English publications on laparoscopic liver resections. All data were analyzed and apparent case duplications in updated series were excluded from the total number of patients. Tumor type, operative characteristics, perioperative morbidity, and oncologic outcomes were tabulated. A total of 127 published articles of original series on laparoscopic liver resection were identified, and accounted for 2,804 reported minimally invasive liver resections. Fifty percent were for malignant tumors, 45% were for benign lesions, 1.7% were for live donor hepatectomies, and the rest were indeterminate. Of the resections, 75% were performed totally laparoscopically, 17% were hand-assisted, and 2% were laparoscopic-assisted open hepatic resection (hybrid) technique, with the remainder being other techniques or conversions to open hepatectomies. The most common laparoscopic liver resection was a wedge resection or segmentectomy (45%) followed by anatomic left lateral sectionectomy (20%), right hepatectomy (9%), and left hepatectomy (7%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open laparotomy and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 4.1% and 0.7% of reported cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 9 of 2,804 patients (0.3%), and morbidity was 10.5%, with no intraoperative deaths reported. The most common cause of postoperative death was liver failure. Postoperative bile leak was observed in 1.5% of cases. For cancer resections, negative surgical margins were achieved in 82% to 100% of reported series. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were 50% to 75% and 31% to 38.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates after laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal metastasis to the liver were 80% to 87% and 51%, respectively. In experienced hands, laparoscopic liver resections are safe with acceptable morbidity and mortality for both minor and major hepatic resections. Oncologically, 3- and 5-year survival rates reported for hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer metastases are comparable to open hepatic resection, albeit in a selected group of patients.Keywords
This publication has 92 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic sectionectomy: A comparative studyEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- Early Experiences of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Liver ResectionYonsei Medical Journal, 2008
- The Impact of Margins on Outcome After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal MetastasisAnnals of Surgery, 2007
- Is Liver Resection Justified for Patients With Hepatic Metastases From Breast Cancer?Annals of Surgery, 2006
- Laparoscopic liver surgery: Shifting the management of liver tumorsHepatology, 2006
- Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy in Living DonorsAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Laparoscopic anatomic liver resectionHPB, 2004
- Laparoscopic resection of hepatic colorectal metastasesHPB, 2004
- Laparoscopic liver resectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- A comparative study of the short-term outcome following open and laparoscopic liver resection of colorectal metastasesSurgical Endoscopy, 2002