Reliability and validity of functional balance tests post stroke
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Rehabilitation
- Vol. 18 (8) , 916-923
- https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr821oa
Abstract
Objective: To contribute to the reliability and validity of a series of functional balance tests for use post stroke. Design: Within-session, test-retest and intertester reliability was tested using the kappa coefficient and intraclass correlations. The tests were performed three times and the first and third attempts compared to test the within-session reliability. The tests were repeated a few days later to assess test-retest reliability and were scored simultaneously by two physiotherapists to assess the intertester reliability. To test criterion-related validity the tests were compared with the sitting section of the Motor Assessment Scale, Berg Balance Scale and Rivermead Mobility Index using Spearman's rho. Setting: Stroke physiotherapy services of six National Health Service hospitals. Participants: People with a post stroke hemiplegia attending physiotherapy who had no other pathology affecting their balance took part. Thirty-five people participated in the reliability testing and 48 people took part in the validity testing. Main outcome measures: The following functional balance tests were used: supported sitting balance, sitting arm raise, sitting forward reach, supported standing balance, standing arm raise, standing forward reach, static tandem standing, weight shift, timed 5-m walk with and without an aid, tap and step-up tests. Results: The ordinal level tests (supported sitting and standing balance and static tandem standing tests) showed 100% agreement in all aspects of reliability. Intraclass correlations for the other tests ranged from 0.93 to 0.99. All the tests showed significant correlations with the appropriate comparator tests (r=0.32-0.74 p≤0.05), except the weight shift test and step-up tests which did not form significant relationship with Berg Balance Scale (r=0.26 and 0.19 respectively). Conclusion: These functional balance tests are reliable and valid measures of balance disability post stroke.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post strokeClinical Rehabilitation, 2004
- A clinical model for the assessment of posture and balance in people with strokeDisability and Rehabilitation, 2003
- The Measurement of Balance Post-Stroke. Part 3: Instrumented Measurement ToolsPhysical Therapy Reviews, 2002
- Reliability of clinical balance outcome measures in the elderlyPhysiotherapy Research International, 1998
- Comparison of upper-extremity balance tasks and force platform testing in persons with hemiparesis.PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1997
- Functional Reach: A Marker of Physical FrailtyJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1992
- The Rivermead Mobility Index: A further development of the Rivermead Motor AssessmentInternational Disability Studies, 1991
- Functional Reach: A New Clinical Measure of BalanceJournal of Gerontology, 1990
- Mobility after stroke: Reliability of measures of impairment and disabilityInternational Disability Studies, 1990
- Investigation of a New Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke PatientsPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1985