Microtubule-dependent Changes in Assembly of Microtubule Motor Proteins and Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Proteins at PtK1 Kinetochores
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB) in Molecular Biology of the Cell
- Vol. 12 (7) , 1995-2009
- https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.7.1995
Abstract
The ability of kinetochores to recruit microtubules, generate force, and activate the mitotic spindle checkpoint may all depend on microtubule- and/or tension-dependent changes in kinetochore assembly. With the use of quantitative digital imaging and immunofluorescence microscopy of PtK1 tissue cells, we find that the outer domain of the kinetochore, but not the CREST-stained inner core, exhibits three microtubule-dependent assembly states, not directly dependent on tension. First, prometaphase kinetochores with few or no kinetochore microtubules have abundant punctate or oblate fluorescence morphology when stained for outer domain motor proteins CENP-E and cytoplasmic dynein and checkpoint proteins BubR1 and Mad2. Second, microtubule depolymerization induces expansion of the kinetochore outer domain into crescent and ring morphologies around the centromere. This expansion may enhance recruitment of kinetochore microtubules, and occurs with more than a 20- to 100-fold increase in dynein and relatively little change in CENP-E, BubR1, and Mad2 in comparison to prometaphase kinetochores. Crescents disappear and dynein decreases substantially upon microtubule reassembly. Third, when kinetochores acquire their full metaphase complement of kinetochore microtubules, levels of CENP-E, dynein, and BubR1 decrease by three- to sixfold in comparison to unattached prometaphase kinetochores, but remain detectable. In contrast, Mad2 decreases by 100-fold and becomes undetectable, consistent with Mad2 being a key factor for the “wait-anaphase” signal produced by unattached kinetochores. Like previously found for Mad2, the average amounts of CENP-E, dynein, or BubR1 at metaphase kinetochores did not change with the loss of tension induced by taxol stabilization of microtubules.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Waiting for AnaphaseCell, 2000
- KINETOCHORES AND THE CHECKPOINT MECHANISM THAT MONITORS FOR DEFECTS IN THE CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION MACHINERYAnnual Review of Genetics, 1998
- CENP-E Function at Kinetochores Is Essential for Chromosome AlignmentThe Journal of cell biology, 1997
- How Cells Get the Right ChromosomesScience, 1997
- Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome.The Journal of cell biology, 1996
- Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis.The Journal of cell biology, 1996
- Modulation of CENP-E organization at kinetochores by spindle microtubule attachmentCell Motility, 1996
- Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint.The Journal of cell biology, 1995
- Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase.The Journal of cell biology, 1995
- Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomesThe Journal of cell biology, 1993