Methodology in the “Job Quality” Debate
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society
- Vol. 29 (1) , 94-110
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232x.1990.tb00743.x
Abstract
This paper critically examines the use of the earnings distribution of net employment gains in the analysis of “new jobs.” The paper explains why this measure of economic performance is not robust and why it can be misleading. Alternative analyses, based on industry and/or accupation, are more robust and may be more informative. Illustrative results show that the new job growth has been concentrated in industries with generally lower wages than the industries where jobs have been lost.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- AnalysisChallenge, 1988
- Can Inter-Industry Wage Differentials Justify Strategic Trade Policy?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1988
- Income Inequality: An Inter‐Industry AnalysisIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1988
- Efficiency Wages and the Inter-Industry Wage StructureEconometrica, 1988
- Inter-Industry Wage Differences and Theories of Wage DeterminationPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1987
- Sectoral Shifts and the Size of the Middle ClassThe Brookings Review, 1984
- Accuracy of Response in Labor Market Surveys: Evidence and ImplicationsJournal of Labor Economics, 1983