Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 24 (3) , 361-379
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a240361
Abstract
In recent years urban policy has come to rely increasingly on private-sector property development to provide the driving force. Popular opinion is sharply divided about the value of this approach. In this paper, an examination is made of five ways in which property could contribute to urban economic regeneration: through the direct employment effects of construction-related activity; by accommodating the expansion of indigenous firms; by attracting inward investment; by revitalising run-down neighbourhoods; and by initiating area-wide economic restructuring. Appropriate property development can have positive economic effects but it has to be part of a more holistic approach that embodies concerns for people living in deprived areas and for the underlying condition of the local economy. Unrestrained market-led development may have detrimental consequences for the economic fabric of cities and for the quality of life of their residents.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Explaining the Improbable Local Redevelopment in the Wake of Federal CutbacksJournal of the American Planning Association, 1990
- Public Investment and Privatisation in the New Towns: A Financial Assessment of BracknellEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1990
- First Steps in Urban Policy Evaluation in the United KingdomUrban Studies, 1990
- The Competitive Advantage of NationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1990
- Evaluation and Understanding in Local Economic PolicyUrban Studies, 1989
- The Thatcher Government's urban policy: a reviewTown Planning Review, 1989
- Development planning and local economic growth: A study of process and policy in Bracknell New TownProgress in Planning, 1989