Are Cochlear Implant Patients Suffering From Perceptual Dissonance?
- 1 October 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Ear & Hearing
- Vol. 26 (5) , 435-450
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000179688.87621.48
Abstract
Cochlear implants provide functional hearing to the majority of recipients and have gained widespread acceptance clinically, but the range of performance remains great and largely unexplained. Designs for implanted electrodes and electronics have converged, whereas novel speech processing strategies have proliferated. For each patient, the fitting audiologist must sort empirically through options that produce large but idiosyncratic differences in both objective performance and subjective preference. This review and analysis suggests that the place-pitch and rate-pitch theories on which cochlear implants have been designed are incomplete. The missing component may be related to the phase-locking of auditory nerve activity to both acoustic and electrical stimulation. This component is likely to be highly distorted by electrical stimulation but its importance as one of several different pitch encoding mechanisms may vary widely among patients. Systematic means to control these putative phase effects using modern, high-speed, and high-density cochlear implants may make it possible to identify more efficiently the best strategy for a given patient and to minimize the perceptual confusion that arises from conflicting cues.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cortical Responses to Cochlear Implant Stimulation: Channel InteractionsJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2004
- Noise Enhances Modulation Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Listeners: Stochastic Resonance in a Prosthetic Sensory System?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2001
- Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processorsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996
- Longitudinal Changes in Word Recognition by Patients Who Use the Ineraid Cochlear ImplantEar & Hearing, 1990
- How the ear's works workNature, 1989
- Effects of nonlinearities on speech encoding in the auditory nerveThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980
- Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressureThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980
- Lateralization of Filtered ClicksThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971
- Tonal Consonance and Critical BandwidthThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965
- The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to TelephonyThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950