Dropout Rates in Randomized Clinical Trials of Antipsychotics: A Meta-analysis Comparing First- and Second-Generation Drugs and an Examination of the Role of Trial Design Features
- 26 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Vol. 35 (4) , 775-788
- https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn005
Abstract
Dropout is often used as an outcome measure in clinical trials of antipsychotic medication. Previous research is inconclusive regarding (a) differences in dropout rates between first- and second-generation antipsychotic medications and (b) how trial design features reduce dropout. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antipsychotic medication was conducted to compare dropout rates for first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs and to examine how a broad range of design features effect dropout. Ninety-three RCTs that met inclusion criteria were located (n = 26 686). Meta-analytic random effects models showed that dropout was higher for first- than second-generation drugs (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-1.66). This advantage persisted after removing study arms with excessively high dosages, in flexible dose studies, studies of patients with symptom exacerbation, nonresponder patients, inpatients, and outpatients. Mixed effects models for meta-analysis were used to identify design features that effected dropout and develop formulae to derive expected dropout rates based on trial design features, and these assigned a pivotal role to duration. Collectively, dropout rates are lower for second- than first-generation antipsychotic drugs and appear to be partly explained by trial design features thus providing direction for future trial design.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-analysis of drop-out rates in randomised clinical trials, comparing typical and atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophreniaEuropean Psychiatry, 2006
- Olanzapine Treatment of Residual Positive and Negative SymptomsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2005
- A double-blind, randomized comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine for 6 months in the treatment of schizophreniaInternational Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2004
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Olanzapine in the Prevention of Psychotic RelapseJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 2003
- Olanzapine vs haloperidol in geriatric schizophrenia: analysis of data from a double‐blind controlled trialInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2003
- P.2.084 A comparison of olanzapine and risperidone for the schizophrenic patients intolerance of neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal syndromes (EPS)European Neuropsychopharmacology, 2003
- Atypical and Conventional Antipsychotic Drugs in Treatment-Naive First-Episode Schizophrenia: A 52-Week Randomized Trial of Clozapine Vs ChlorpromazineNeuropsychopharmacology, 2003
- Amisulpride vs. Risperidone in Chronic Schizophrenia Results of a 6-month Double-blind StudyNeuropsychopharmacology, 2002
- Amisulpride has a superior benefit/risk profile to haloperidol in schizophrenia: results of a multicentre, double-blind study (the Amisulpride Study Group*European Psychiatry, 2000
- Treatment of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia with AmisulprideThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1995