Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youths
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 40 (6) , 631-640
- https://doi.org/10.1080/001401397187928
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact of different methods of carrying book bags on static posture and gait kinematics of youths aged 11–13 years. Surveys identified group descriptive characteristics of subjects and book bags. Ten subjects representing the best composite of the mean characteristics of this population were filmed for both static posture and dynamic conditions of one stride length. Subjects participated in four conditions: without bag (WO), one-strap backpack (1BP), two-strap backpack (2BP), and one-strap athletic bag (ATH). Lateral spinal deviation was not significantly different between 2BP and WO. However, differences (±SE) were observed between 1BP (8.5±0·7°) and ATH (8·3±2·4°) as compared with WO (1·9±0·5°). Shoulder elevation from a horizontal position showed no difference between WO and 2BP. Without bag (2·0±0·9°) was different from 1BP 17·6±1·8°) and ATH (15·6±2·1°). 1BP was also different from 2BP (3·4 ±1·1°). Bag carrying significantly decreased stride length (1·597plusmn;0·04 m) and increased stride frequency (57·36±1·6 cycles/min) compared to WO (1·72±0·06 m; 54·64±1·2 cycles/min, respectively), thereby reducing the support phase of the gait. One-strap bags (1BP, ATH) promoted lateral spinal bending and shoulder elevation, while the two-strap backpack significantly reduced these book bag carrying stresses. ATH promoted greater angular motion of the head and trunk as compared to backpack book bags. Carrying a backpack (1BP, 2BP) promoted significant forward lean of head and trunk compared to ATH or WO. In conclusion, the daily physical stresses associated with carrying book bags on one shoulder (1BP, ATH) significantly alters the posture and gait of youth.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physiological and perceptual responses to load–carrying in female subjects using internal and external frame backpacksErgonomics, 1992
- Postural adjustments while standing with two types of loaded backpack ∗Ergonomics, 1987
- The effects of load placement on the EMG activity of the low back muscles during load carrying by men and womenErgonomics, 1987
- Comparison of five modes of carrying a load close to the trunkErgonomics, 1985
- Effects of different loads and carrying systems on selected biomechanical parameters describing walking gaitErgonomics, 1985
- Physiological responses to load holding and load carriageErgonomics, 1983
- A Comparison of Marrow Transplantation with Chemotherapy for Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Second or Subsequent RemissionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- HANDBAG PARÆSTHESIAThe Lancet, 1976
- Rucksack paralysisJAMA, 1969
- CARRYING OF SCHOOL BAGS BY CHILDRENErgonomics, 1965