The tiny enslaved genome of a rhizarian alga
Open Access
- 20 June 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 103 (25) , 9379-9380
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603505103
Abstract
At least twice in the history of life a predatory nonphotosynthetic protozoan cell ate a eukaryotic algal cell and enslaved it internally instead of digesting it, thereby becoming a chimeric photophagotrophic cell with two distinct nuclei and remarkably complex membrane topology—far surpassing that of animals or plants. In their descendants, the host nucleus became dominant, whereas that of the algal slave shrank by transfer of most of its genes into the main nucleus and retargeting the proteins they encode back into the enslaved chloroplast. Some descendants managed to transfer all essential genes and lose the enslaved nuclei altogether while retaining the algal chloroplast and plasma membrane (e.g., brown seaweeds), but in two groups of algae, cryptomonads (1) and chlorarachneans (2–4), the enslaved nucleus remains in the chimeric cell many millions of years afterward, raising fascinating questions for cell and evolutionary biology. How are functions shared between two evolutionarily unrelated nuclei, and how do their proteins integrate into one harmonious cell? The first inklings of answers came with the first nucleomorph genome sequence from a cryptomonad (1). In this issue of PNAS, Gilson et al. (5) report the first genome sequence of a chlorarachnean nucleomorph, the tiniest nucleus in nature. Fig. 1 shows how these two unusual algal groups fit on the eukaryote evolutionary tree (6, 7). Cryptomonads belong to a vast branch, the chromalveolates, formed by a single enslavement of a red alga (8, 9) and containing eight phyla: two mainly photosynthetic [Ochrophyta (including brown algae, diatoms, and eight other algal classes) and Haptophyta]; two with one algal class each (dinoflagellates and cryptomonads) but many heterotrophs; and four entirely nonphotosynthetic (e.g., ciliate protozoa, and Pseudofungi) (10). By contrast, chlorarachneans belong to Rhizaria, a typically amoeboid group characterized by long, thin-branching pseudopods that often anastomose as a … *E-mail: tom.cavalier-smith{at}zoo.ox.ac.ukKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complete nucleotide sequence of the chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph: Nature’s smallest nucleusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Cell evolution and Earth history: stasis and revolutionPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary StudiesMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2005
- Myosin domain evolution and the primary divergence of eukaryotesNature, 2005
- Homologous and heterologous reconstitution of Golgi to chloroplast transport and protein import into the complex chloroplasts of EuglenaJournal of Cell Science, 2005
- Gene Replacement of Fructose-1,6-Bisphosphate Aldolase Supports the Hypothesis of a Single Photosynthetic Ancestor of ChromalveolatesEukaryotic Cell, 2004
- Chromalveolate Diversity and Cell MegaevolutionPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2004
- Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of ProtozoaEuropean Journal of Protistology, 2003
- Some simplified NP-complete graph problemsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Taxonomic studies on the Chlorarachniophyta. II. Generic delimitation of the chlorarachniophytes and description of Gymnochlora stellata gen. et sp. nov. and Lotharella gen. nov.Phycological Research, 1996