Chronic rejection in renal transplant recipients – Risk factors and correlates
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Transplantation
- Vol. 8 (3pt2) , 332-335
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.1994.tb00264.x
Abstract
To effectively study risk factors, a uniform definition of chronic rejection must be agreed upon. The definition must describe a typical clinical course ‐ e.g., gradual deterioration in graft function starting at least 3 months post‐transplant and lasting at least 6 months in combination with a characteristic biopsy. Numerous kidney transplant studies indicate that an acute rejection episode is an important predictor of 1‐year graft survival and half‐life (the time it takes for half the grafts that survive the 1st year to subsequently fail). However, in each of these studies there are multiple potential causes of graft loss ‐ acute rejection, chronic rejection, patient death, and recurrent disease. We have tried to eliminate this problem by studying patients with biopsyor nephrectomy‐proven chronic rejection. In a univariate analysis we found that an acute rejection episode significantly increased the risk of developing biopsy‐proven chronic rejection (p<0.001). Risk was higher in patients with more than one acute rejection episode and in patients whose rejection episode occurred more than 60 days after transplant. In a separate multivariate analysis, we studied the impact of the following variables on the incidence of biopsy‐proven chronic rejection: transplant number (first or retransplant), age at transplant (over 18, 18 to 50 years old, under 50), gender, HLA‐ABDR match, peak and transplant panel reactive antibody, number of acute rejection episodes, infection, donor age, and cyclosporine (CSA) dose at 1 year (less than 5 mg/kg versus more than 5 mg/kg). Individual analyses were carried out for recipients of cadaver grafts and living‐related donor grafts. For both groups, the most important variable was acute rejection; other significant variables were infection and CSA dose at 1 year. Other factors may be important in the development or prevention of chronic rejection. Noncompliance, for one, appears to be associated with an increased incidence of chronic rejection. Second, some patients develop anti‐HLA antibodies following transplant; reports indicate that these patients experience increased late graft loss. Third, some patients with acute rejection subsequently develop donor antigen specific hyporesponsiveness; these patients have a low incidence of chronic rejection.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- EARLY VERSUS LATE ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTIONTransplantation, 1993
- ARE MULTIPLE IMMUNOPATHOGENETIC EVENTS OCCURRING DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF OBLITERATIVE BRONCHIOLITIS AND ACUTE REJECTION?Transplantation, 1993
- EVIDENCE THAT IMPROVED LATE RENAL TRANSPLANT OUTCOME CORRELATES WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF IN VITRO DONOR ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC HYPOREACTIVITYTransplantation, 1993
- LRISK FACTORS FOR CHRONIC REJECTION IN RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1993
- Causes of Renal Allograft LossAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- SOLUBLE HLA ANTIGENS, ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES, AND ANTIIDIOTYPIC ANTIBODIES IN THE CIRCULATION OF RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1991
- THE ROLE OF ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES IN HEART TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1991
- SEROLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ANTIBODIES ELUTED FROM CHRONICALLY REJECTED HUMAN RENAL ALLOGRAFTSTransplantation, 1981