ATTENTION TRAINING: THE USE OF OVERCORRECTION AVOIDANCE TO INCREASE THE EYE CONTACT OF AUTISTIC AND RETARDED CHILDREN
- 1 September 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 10 (3) , 489-499
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1977.10-489
Abstract
A crucial first step in teaching and training the retarded and autistic is to develop and maintain eye contact with the therapist. Functional movement training (an overcorrection procedure) plus edibles and praise were compared with edibles and praise alone as a method of developing eye contact in three such children. In both conditions, the child was given food and praise when eye contact occurred within 5 sec of the therapist's verbal prompt: “Look at me.” Functional movement training avoidance plus edibles and praise produced about 90% attention for the three children, while edibles and praise alone were less effective (eye contact never exceeded 55%). Functional movement training avoidance combined with edibles and praise appears to be an effective method of teaching eye contact and possibly other forms of instruction‐following to behaviorally disordered children who are not always responsive to positive consequences.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teaching language to nonverbal children-with emphasis on problems of generalization.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- THE ELIMINATION OF AUTISTIC SELF‐STIMULATORY BEHAVIOR BY OVERCORRECTION1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1973
- Operant conditioning of kindergarten-class behavior in autistic children∗Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1968
- Reduction of Autistic Gaze Aversion by Reinforcement of Visual Attention ResponsesThe Journal of Special Education, 1968
- CONTROL OF EYE CONTACT IN AN AUTISTIC CHILDJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1967
- Establishing functional speech in echolalic childrenBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1967
- Acquisition of Imitative Speech by Schizophrenic ChildrenScience, 1966
- PUNISHMENT BY NOISE IN AN ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE SITUATION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964