Appropriateness of ambulance transportation to a suburban pediatric emergency department

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective. To assess the appropriateness of ambulance use in patients presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED), with regard to both medical necessity and insurance status. Methods. The authors conducted a one-year retrospective chart analysis of all patients (age range 2 weeks to 19 years) who were transported via ambulance in 1994 to a suburban children's hospital ED. ED records of all patients who arrived by ambulance were abstracted for demographic data, type of insurance, chief complaint, medical interventions, discharge diagnosis, and disposition. Ambulance transportation was deemed unnecessary unless the medical record revealed any of the following criteria: 1) requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 2) respiratory distress, 3) altered mental status or seizure, 4) immobilization, 5) inability to walk, 6) admission to intensive care, 7) ambulance recommended by medical personnel, 8) motor vehicle collision, or 9) parents not on scene. Results. 43% of the ambulance patients were insured by Medicaid, compared with 29% of the overall ED population. Thus, Medicaid patients were significantly more likely to use ambulance transportation than were patients with commercial insurance (p<0.001). 28% of patients who arrived by ambulance were judged to have used the ambulance transportation unnecessarily. Of the unnecessary transports, 60% were insured by Medicaid. Thus, Medicaid patients were significantly more likely to have used ambulance transportation unnecessarily (p<0.001). The most common reason for appropriate ambulance use was seizure activity; the most common reason for inappropriate use was fever. Conclusion. Inappropriate use of ambulance transportation is common in this pediatric population, with Medicaid patients accounting for a significant majority of the misuse.