Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence
- 7 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 149 (2) , 289-300
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6
Abstract
Coexistence in bumblebee communities has largely been investigated at local spatial scales. However, local resource partitioning does not fully explain the species diversity of bumblebee communities. Theoretical studies provide new evidence that partitioning of space can promote species coexistence, when species interact with their environment at different spatial scales. If bumblebee species possess specific foraging ranges, different spatial resource utilisation patterns might operate as an additional mechanism of coexistence in bumblebee communities. We investigated the effects of the landscape-wide availability of different resources (mass flowering crops and semi-natural habitats) on the local densities of four bumblebee species at 12 spatial scales (landscape sectors with 250–3,000 m radius) to indirectly identify the spatial scales at which the bumblebees perceive their environment. The densities of all bumblebee species were enhanced in landscapes with high proportions of mass flowering crops (mainly oilseed rape). We found the strongest effects for Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus lapidarius at large spatial scales, implying foraging distances of 3,000 and 2,750 m, respectively. The densities of Bombus pascuorum were most strongly influenced at a medium spatial scale (1,000 m), and of Bombus pratorum (with marginal significance) at a small spatial scale (250 m). The estimated foraging ranges tended to be related to body and colony sizes, indicating that larger species travel over larger distances than smaller species, presumably enabling them to build up larger colonies through a better exploitation of food resources. We conclude that coexistence in bumblebee communities could potentially be mediated by species-specific differences in the spatial resource utilisation patterns, which should be considered in conservation schemes.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- The response of foraging bumblebees to successional change in newly created arable field marginsBiological Conservation, 2003
- Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesisEcology Letters, 2003
- Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinatorsMolecular Ecology, 2003
- Habitat quality of field margins in a Finnish farmland area for bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Bombus and Psithyrus)Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2002
- Body Size‐Related Coexistence: An Approach Through Allometric Constraints on Home‐Range UseEcology, 1995
- The plant—pollinator landscapePublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Foraging Theory, Patch Use, and the Structure of a Negev Desert Granivore CommunityEcology, 1994
- Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: apidae)Oecologia, 1985
- Bumble Bee Colonization, Extinction, and Reproduction in Subalpine Meadows in Northeastern UtahEcology, 1985
- Differences in the Flowers Visited by Four Species of Bumble-Bees and their CausesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1957