Multimodality Treatment of Complex Renal Calculi

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
More than 2,500 patients were treated for urolithiasis from 1984 to 1987. In an effort to define the relative role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy with respect to size, location and composition of the calculus 912 of these patients (224 of whom underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 688 of whom underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) were reviewed. Size proved to be the only significant factor in the success and complication rates of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy but it did not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The roles of these 2 modalities were then examined with respect to the treatment of complex renal calculi. We reviewed 376 patients with complex renal calculi, including 40 percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients from the initial 912 patients studied. The initial therapy in 100 of these patients, treated consecutively, was extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The remaining 276 patients were treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy in the treatment of complex renal calculi was 36%. The success rate of primary percutaneous nephrolithotomy was 83%. We conclude that percutaneous nephrolithotomy should be the primary therapy for patients with complex renal calculi. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the preferred treatment for patients with smaller calculi and as an adjunct to percutaneous nephrolithotomy.