Differential risks to males and females for congenital malformations among 2.5 million California births, 1989–1997
- 11 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
- Vol. 67 (12) , 953-958
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.10129
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many studies have observed variations in the prevalence of specific malformations by sex, there is a lack of population-based data on potential malformation prevalence differences by sex at birth. METHODS Our objective was to explore differences in the prevalence of structural congenital malformation phenotypes between sexes in a California population of 2.5 million live- and stillbirths, using data from a population-based active surveillance system. Ascertainment was performed among offspring of California women who delivered in nonmilitary hospitals during the period of 1989–1997. Malformations were grouped according to the four-digit malformation codes of the British Pediatric Association. RESULTS Overall, 32,619 males and 21,835 females were considered to have structural congenital malformations, with prevalences of 2.52% and 1.76%, respectively. Thus, males demonstrated a malformation prevalence that was 22% higher than that in females. Using a criterion of a 40% increase or decrease in the relative risk for males, increased risks for 15 and decreased risks for 17 specific malformation categories were observed. Increased risks were associated with most organ systems, with the notable exception of the nervous system (increased risks for nervous system malformations were observed among female births). Risks were not substantially influenced by adjusting for maternal age, race/ethnicity, parity, or education. CONCLUSIONS Our observations extend the relatively few studies that have investigated differential prevalences of a large number of specific structural malformations between male and female births. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 67:000–000, 2003.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Significance of sib sex ratios in testing the hypothesis that some sex-biased congenital malformations are caused by unusual maternal hormone profilesBirth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 2003
- Potential of the hormonal hypothesis of sex ratio to explain the unusual sex ratios typical of some malformationsTeratology, 2002
- Unusual intrauterine sex hormone profiles as a potential cause of sex ratios typical of some malformations: Reply to Dr. JamesTeratology, 2002
- Sex differences in the prevalence of human birth defects: A population‐based studyTeratology, 2001
- Maternal risk factors in cleft lip and palate: case control studyBritish Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2000
- Is Transposition of the Great Arteries a Consequence of Maternal Hormone Imbalance? Evidence from the Sex Ratios of Relatives of ProbandsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1999
- Evidence that Mammalian Sex Ratios at Birth are Partially Controlled by Parental Hormone Levels at The Time of ConceptionJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1996
- International study of sex ratio and twinning of neural tube defectsTeratology, 1994
- A population‐based study of congenital diaphragmatic herniaTeratology, 1992
- Sex differences in the incidence of certain congenital malformations: A review of the literature and some new dataTeratology, 1971