Common Areas of Litigation Related to Care During Labor and Birth
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing
- Vol. 17 (2) , 110-125
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005237-200304000-00004
Abstract
Reducing the risk of liability exposure and avoiding preventable injuries to mothers and infants during labor and birth can be relatively easy when all members of the perinatal care team (nurses, nurse-midwives, and physicians) agree to follow two basic tenets of clinical practice: use applicable evidence and/or published standards and guidelines as the foundation for care and whenever a clinical choice is presented, choose patient safety rather than production. Adhering to these two principles could theoretically eliminate the need for extensive and overly detailed policy and procedure manuals. Most clinicians feel the need to have some written guidelines for practice. A summary of the most common foci of professional perinatal liability claims together with the most current applicable evidence and published standards and guidelines from professional associations and regulatory agencies is provided. The purpose is to provide a framework for reviewing existing institutional protocols and/or developing future policies and guidelines that decrease professional liability exposure and minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury to mothers and infants.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Problems with intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation and patient managementPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- Pharmacology of Oxytocin and ProstaglandinsClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- The Nurse's Role During Oxytocin AdministrationMCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 2000
- High reliability perinatal units: An approach to the prevention of patient injury and medical malpractice claimsJournal of Healthcare Risk Management, 1999
- The Fetal Admission Test and Intrapartum Fetal DeathAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1998
- Active management of labor: Does it make a difference?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- A Clinical Trial of Active Management of LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Labor Admission TestClinics in Perinatology, 1994
- A Controlled Trial of a Program for the Active Management of LaborNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- The scalp stimulation test: A clinical alternative to fetal scalp blood samplingAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984