Borderline or malignant ovarian tumour? A case report of decision making with morphometry.
- 1 October 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 37 (10) , 1110-1113
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.37.10.1110
Abstract
A young woman presented with bilateral ovarian tumors. Multiple sections of each tumor were shown to many pathologists for consultation; some considered the tumors to be borderline, whereas others thought that one or both of them was malignant. Morphometry showed that the numerical classification probabilities for borderline tumor were 0.78 for the left ovarian tumor and 0.85 in the right. The lesions were therefore regarded as borderline tumors and no additional chemotherapy was given. Three years after the 2nd operation the patient is alive and well without clinical or biochemical evidence of recurrence. Most patients with borderline tumors who die from the disease do so in the 1st 2 yr after the operation. This young patient was prevented from severe overtreatment by the application of morphometry, illustrating its use in this area of diagnostic gynecopathology.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Classification of New Cases: Some Aspects of Single and Multivariate AnalysisPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- Disagreement of histopathological diagnoses of different pathologists in ovarian tumors — with some theoretical considerationsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1982
- Computer-aided application of quantitative microscopy in diagnostic pathology.1982
- Quantitation of borderline and malignant mucinous ovarian tumoursHistopathology, 1981
- The Threshold Approach to Clinical Decision MakingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary.Histologic criteria and clinical behaviorCancer, 1973