On Weighing Gains and Investments at the Margin of Risk Regulation
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 7 (3) , 361-369
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00472.x
Abstract
Analysts have long noted an apparent discrepancy in the level of investment seemingly necessary to meet "acceptable" levels of public safety. At the margin of risk regulation, i.e., where safety determination is judged acceptable, the traditional cost-benefit calculus appears to contribute obvious rationale to the final political decision. Efforts are now being made to introduce a measure of consistency into the application of risk-cost benefit analysis to radiological protection. This paper reviews these efforts from a UK perspective. It also looks at how the issue was treated in a public setting through the Sizewell B Public Inquiry.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value of Life and Safety: a Survey of Recent DevelopmentsThe Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 1985
- Risk Management, Assessment, and Acceptability12Risk Analysis, 1985
- The Sizewell B Inquiry and a National Energy StrategyThe Geographical Journal, 1984
- Investigation as legitimacy: the maturing of the big public inquiryGeoforum, 1984
- Risk and CulturePublished by University of California Press ,1983
- $s for Lives: Ethical Considerations in the Use of Cost/Benefit Analysis by For‐Profit FirmsRisk Analysis, 1982
- Value of a Life: What Difference Does It Make?1Risk Analysis, 1981
- Risk in Benefit‐Cost AnalysisRisk Analysis, 1981