Accuracy of gleason grading by practicing pathologists and the impact of education on improving agreement
- 17 July 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Human Pathology
- Vol. 34 (7) , 658-665
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00191-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 yearsCancer, 2002
- The value of multiple core biopsies for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancerBJU International, 2001
- Comparison of Gleason Scores from Sextant Prostate Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensUrologia Internationalis, 2001
- Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens: Predictive Accuracy of Gleason Score and Tumor SiteUrologia Internationalis, 2001
- Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: General pathologistHuman Pathology, 2001
- Gleason Score 2–4 Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Needle BiopsyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2000
- Interobserver variation in prostate cancer Gleason scoring: Are there implications for the design of clinical trials and treatment strategies?Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Effect of the Number of Core Biopsies of the Prostate on Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1996
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma: Reproducibility and correlation with clinical stages of four grading systemsHuman Pathology, 1988
- Incidental prostatic carcinoma: Tumor extent versus histologic gradeUrology, 1982