Cerebral Asymmetries in Random-Dot Stereopsis: Reversal of Direction with Changes in Dot Size
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 8 (6) , 683-690
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p080683
Abstract
Visual field differences in stereoscopic form recognition using Julesz-type random dot stereograms were investigated. Dot size was varied in order to test the possibility that variations in the carrier dimension have contributed to past estimates of visual field differences. Twelve male and twelve female subjects, all right-handed, appeared for three test sessions—one with each different dot size. In each session the stimuli were flashed twenty-four times in each visual field, for 120 ms. Results showed no overall visual field effect, but a highly significant interaction between visual field and dot size. For small dots, left visual field superiority was observed, as previously reported by Durnford and Kimura. With large dots, however, the right visual field was superior. This reversal of visual field differences as a function of dot size implies that there is no consistent cerebral hemispheric specialization for stereopsis or stereoscopic form recognition per se. Instead, it appears that there is relative hemispheric specialization for responding to the carrier of stereoscopic information.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experience and Latency to Achieve StereopsisPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1976
- ALICE: A system for manipulating and analyzing multidimensional dataBehavior Research Methods, 1976
- Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and RivalryPerception, 1975
- Dynamic Random-Dot Stereograms Reveal Up-Down Anisotropy and Left-Right Isotropy Between Cortical HemifieldsScience, 1975
- HEMISPHERIC ASYMMETRIES IN TACHISTOSCOPIC INFORMATION‐PROCESSINGBritish Journal of Psychology, 1972
- Right Hemisphere Specialization for Depth Perception reflected in Visual Field DifferencesNature, 1971
- Further Observations on the Nature of Effective Binocular DisparitiesThe American Journal of Psychology, 1965
- Binocular Depth Perception of Computer-Generated PatternsBell System Technical Journal, 1960