Survival and prognostic factors in BRCA1-associated breast cancer
Open Access
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 17 (3) , 391-400
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdj095
Abstract
Background: Studies comparing survival in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancer (BC) report inconsistent results and frequently concern small sample sizes. Further, the prognostic impact of the classical tumour and treatment factors is unclear in BRCA1-associated BC. Patients and methods: We selected 223 BC patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2001 within families with a deleterious germline BRCA1-mutation ascertained at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. To correct for ascertainment bias, the group of index patients undergoing DNA testing more than 2 years after BC diagnosis (n = 53) was separated from the other BRCA1-patients (n = 170). All BRCA1-associated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age and year of diagnosis to sporadic BC patients. We compared the occurrence of ipsi- and contralateral BC (CBC) as well as distant disease-free (DDFS), BC-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). By multivariate modelling, the prognostic impact of tumour and treatment factors was investigated separately in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancers. Results: For the total group of 669 cases, the median follow-up was 5.1 years, the median age at diagnosis 39 years. We confirmed the existence of the typical BRCA1-associated tumour type and the high CBC incidence. No significant differences between BRCA1-associated and sporadic tumours were found with respect to ipsilateral BC recurrence (HRmult 0.7; P = 0.24), DDFS (HRmult 1.2; P = 0.37) or BC-specific survival (HRmult 1.3; P = 0.23). A trend towards a worse survival was found for BRCA1-associated ductal BC (HRmult 1.5, P = 0.07). Prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated BC were age at diagnosis, tumour size and morphology, and nodal status. Further, survival was non-significantly improved by systemic treatment and a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. No effect on survival of a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy was seen. Conclusions: BRCA1-associated BC is characterised by specific tumour characteristics, a high incidence of CBC and a trend towards a worse survival for the ductal tumour type. Our observation that tumour size and nodal status are also prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated BC implies that the strategy to use these factors as a proxy for ultimate mortality, for instance in BC screening programmes or the consideration of (contralateral) preventive mastectomy, appears to be valid in this specific group of patients.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hazard rates of recurrence following diagnosis of primary breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2005
- BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyondNature Reviews Cancer, 2004
- Disruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1‐related breast carcinomaCancer, 2003
- Use of Genetic Testing and Prophylactic Mastectomy and Oophorectomy in Women With Breast or Ovarian Cancer From Families With a BRCA1 or BRCA2 MutationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Impact of germline BRCA1 mutations and overexpression of p53 on prognosis and response to treatment following breast carcinomaCancer, 2003
- Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: Analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomyInternational Journal of Cancer, 2002
- BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations as prognostic factors in clinical practice and genetic counsellingCancer Treatment Reviews, 2001
- Survival of breast cancer patients in BRCA1, BRCA2, and non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families: A relative survival analysis from FinlandInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Rapid detection of BRCA1 mutations by the protein truncation testNature Genetics, 1995
- Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriersThe Lancet, 1994