Emergence of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer as Standard-of-Care in Academic Comprehensive Cancer Centers
Open Access
- 14 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 95 (20) , 1514-1521
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djg076
Abstract
Background: Ongoing clinical trials are addressing the accuracy and safety of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in the treatment of breast cancer; however, SNB is already increasingly being used in clinical practice. This study examined the extent and time trends of the use of SNB in stage I and II breast cancer patients. Methods: Clinical data were collected from stage I and II (tumor size ⩽5.0 cm) breast cancer patients (n = 3003) who were treated at five comprehensive cancer centers between July 1, 1997, and December 31, 2000. Axillary surgery was classified as SNB alone, SNB + axillary node dissection (AND), AND alone, or none. Patterns of use of axillary surgery were summarized as the percentage of patients receiving each surgery type. The statistical significance of time trends for the use of SNB alone was analyzed by logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Overall, SNB alone was used in 13% of patients, SNB + AND in 22%, AND alone in 59%, and no axillary surgery in 6%. Use of SNB alone was statistically significantly associated with breast-conserving surgery of both smaller (⩽2 cm) and larger tumors (2–5 cm) (P<.001 for both associations). For stage I cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery (n = 1763), use of SNB increased statistically significantly over the study period, from 8% in 1997 to 9%, 14%, 15%, 22%, 42%, and 58% for the next six consecutive 6-month time intervals, respectively. After controlling for center, age, and comorbidity, the odds ratio for the use of SNB alone was 2.30 (95% confidence interval = 1.88 to 2.82) for each 6-month interval (P<.001). Conclusions: Widespread use of SNB outside the clinical trial setting suggests that oncologists at cancer centers in our study have accepted SNB as standard-of-care for the treatment of breast cancer. This acceptance, if it occurs in other cancer centers and community practice, may affect accrual and generalizability of ongoing clinical trials of SNB.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Arm Edema in Breast Cancer PatientsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Prospective Observational Study of Sentinel Lymphadenectomy Without Further Axillary Dissection in Patients With Sentinel Node–Negative Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Incidence of breast carcinoma-related lymphedemaCancer, 1998
- Histopathologic Validation of the Sentinel Lymph Node Hypothesis for Breast CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 1997
- Does Information From Axillary Dissection Change Treatment in Clinically Node-Negative Patients With Breast Cancer?Annals of Surgery, 1997
- Arm morbidity after sector resection and axillary dissection with or without postoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer stage i. results from a randomised trialEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- Axillary lymph nodes and breast cancer. A reviewCancer, 1995
- Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymphadenectomy for Breast CancerAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissectionBritish Journal of Cancer, 1992