Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study
Open Access
- 14 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 7 (1) , 85
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-85
Abstract
Background: Recently, there has been a surge of international interest in combining qualitative and quantitative methods in a single study – often called mixed methods research. It is timely to consider why and how mixed methods research is used in health services research (HSR). Methods: Documentary analysis of proposals and reports of 75 mixed methods studies funded by a research commissioner of HSR in England between 1994 and 2004. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 20 researchers sampled from these studies. Results: 18% (119/647) of HSR studies were classified as mixed methods research. In the documentation, comprehensiveness was the main driver for using mixed methods research, with researchers wanting to address a wider range of questions than quantitative methods alone would allow. Interviewees elaborated on this, identifying the need for qualitative research to engage with the complexity of health, health care interventions, and the environment in which studies took place. Motivations for adopting a mixed methods approach were not always based on the intrinsic value of mixed methods research for addressing the research question; they could be strategic, for example, to obtain funding. Mixed methods research was used in the context of evaluation, including randomised and non-randomised designs; survey and fieldwork exploratory studies; and instrument development. Studies drew on a limited number of methods – particularly surveys and individual interviews – but used methods in a wide range of roles. Conclusion: Mixed methods research is common in HSR in the UK. Its use is driven by pragmatism rather than principle, motivated by the perceived deficit of quantitative methods alone to address the complexity of research in health care, as well as other more strategic gains. Methods are combined in a range of contexts, yet the emerging methodological contributions from HSR to the field of mixed methods research are currently limited to the single context of combining qualitative methods and randomised controlled trials. Health services researchers could further contribute to the development of mixed methods research in the contexts of instrument development, survey and fieldwork, and non-randomised evaluations.This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integration and Publications as Indicators of "Yield" From Mixed Methods StudiesJournal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007
- Paradigm Peace and the Implications for QualityInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2006
- Triangulation and integration: processes, claims and implicationsQualitative Research, 2006
- Generating the evidence base for the National Service Framework for Long Term Conditions: a new research typologyClinical Medicine, 2006
- Quality improvement report Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficultBMJ, 2002
- Blending qualitative and quantitative study methods in health services researchHealth Informatics Journal, 1998
- Salvaging Quantitative Research with Qualitative DataQualitative Health Research, 1995
- Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services researchBMJ, 1995
- Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1993
- Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation DesignsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989