Improving touchscreen keyboards: design issues and a comparison with other devices
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Interacting with Computers
- Vol. 3 (3) , 253-269
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(91)90016-u
Abstract
The study explored touchscreen keyboards using high precision touch-screen strategies. Phase one evaluated three possible monitor positions: 30°, 45°, and 75° from horizontal. Results indicate that the 75° angle, approximately the standard monitor position, resulted in more fatigue and lower preference ratings. Phase two collected touch bias and key size data for the 30° angle. Subjects consistently touched below targets, and touched to the left of targets on either side of the screen. Using these data, a touchscreen keyboard was designed. Phase three compared this keyboard with a mouse-activated keyboard, and the standard QWERTY keyboard for typing relatively short strings of 6,19, and 44 characters. Results indicate that users can type approximately 25 words/minute (wpm) with the touchscreen keyboard, compared to 17 wpm using the mouse, and 58 wpm when using the keyboard. Possible improvements to touchscreen keyboards are suggested.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using a touchscreen for simple tasksInteracting with Computers, 1990
- Touch Screen versus Keyboard: A Comparison of Task Performance of Young ChildrenJournal of Special Education Technology, 1989
- Selection devices for user of an electronic encyclopedia: An empirical comparison of four possibilitiesInformation Processing & Management, 1988
- Factors affecting performance using touch-entry systems: Tactual recognition fields and system accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988
- A comparison of menu selection techniques: touch panel, mouse and keyboardInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1986
- Underlying Behavioral Parameters of the Operation of Touch-Input Devices: Biases, Models, and FeedbackHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1985
- EFFECT OF SLOPED TEXT UPON THE READABILITY OF PRINT*Optometry and Vision Science, 1956