Comparison of electric and magnetic coil stimulation in the supraclavicular region
- 1 May 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Muscle & Nerve
- Vol. 15 (5) , 587-590
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.880150509
Abstract
We compared the compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) evoked in the biceps, triceps, and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles by conventional electrical stimulation at Erb's point (EP), and by magnetic coil stimulation of the supraclavicular region in 11 normal subjects. We found that magnetic coil stimulation was less effective than conventional stimulation in activating motor fibers in the brachial plexus in 45% of the recordings analyzed. CMAP amplitudes greater than those obtained with EP electrical stimulation were seen in 16% of recordings with supraclavicular magnetic stimulation, and in 33% of recordings with cervical magnetic stimulation, indicating that EP electrical stimulation is submaximal in a large proportion of cases.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial dispersion of magnetic stimulation in peripheral nervesMuscle & Nerve, 1990
- Cervical magnetic stimulationNeurology, 1990
- A syndrome of asymmetric limb weakness with motor conduction blockNeurology, 1990
- Multifocal acquired demyelinating neuropathy masqurading as motor neuron diseaseMuscle & Nerve, 1988
- Motor Neuropathy with Proximal Multifocal Persistent Conduction Block, Fasciculations and MyokymiaEuropean Neurology, 1986
- Multifocal demyelinating neuropathy with persistent conduction blockNeurology, 1982
- A test of nerve conduction to muscles of the shoulder girdle as an aid in the diagnosis of proximal neurogenic and muscular diseaseJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1964