Differentiation of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in clinical samples by a real-time taqman PCR assay
- 18 May 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 76 (3) , 350-355
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.20365
Abstract
While the clinical manifestations of HSV-1 and -2 overlap, the site of CNS infection, complications, response to antivirals, frequency of antiviral resistance, and reactivation rate on mucosal surfaces varies between HSV-1 and -2. Detection of HSV DNA by PCR has been shown to be the most sensitive method for detecting HSV in clinical samples. As such, we developed a PCR-based assay to accurately distinguish HSV-1 from HSV-2. Our initial studies indicated the assay using type specific primers was slightly less efficient for detecting HSV-1 and -2 DNA than the high throughput quantitative PCR assay we utilize that employs type common primers to gB. We subsequently evaluated the type specific assay on 3,131 specimens that had HSV DNA detected in the type common PCR assay. The typing results of these specimens were compared with the monoclonal antibody staining results of culture isolates collected from the same patients at the same time, and the HSV serologic status of the patient. The typing assay accurately identified both HSV-1 and -2 with a specificity of >99.5% and was significantly more sensitive than typing by culture and subsequent monoclonal antibody assays. Complete concordance was seen between the typing assay and HSV serologic status of the patient. Dual (HSV-1 and -2) infection in clinical samples was recognized in 2.6% of clinical samples using the new typing assay. This assay, when used in combination with the type common assay, can now accurately type almost all mucosal and visceral HSV isolates by molecular techniques. J. Med. Virol. 76:350–355, 2005.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Duplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection and Quantification of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in Genital and Cutaneous LesionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, 2004
- Herpes Simplex Virus Resistance to Acyclovir and Penciclovir after Two Decades of Antiviral TherapyClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2003
- Quantitative Stability of DNA after Extended Storage of Clinical Specimens as Determined by Real-Time PCRJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Molecular Methods for the Diagnosis of Genital Ulcer Disease in a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Population in Northern Thailand: Predominance of Herpes Simplex Virus InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Comparison of Clinical Diagnosis and Standard Laboratory and Molecular Methods for the Diagnosis of Genital Ulcer Disease in Lesotho: Association with Human Immunodeficiency Virus InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Application of the Polymerase Chain Reaction to the Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus DiseaseThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Recurrence Rates in Genital Herpes after Symptomatic First-Episode InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS TYPE I AND TYPE 2 NEONATAL ENCEPHALITIS IN NEUROLOGICAL OUTCOMEPublished by Elsevier ,1988
- Recurrences after Oral and Genital Herpes Simplex Virus InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Sequential Genital Infections by Herpes Simplex Viruses Types 1 and 2Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1983