GENDER, REHABILITATION, AND PROBATION DECISIONS*
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Criminology
- Vol. 27 (2) , 307-327
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb01034.x
Abstract
This article examines the structure of probation decision making on the perceived “need” level of probationers and the pursuant prescription of “treatment.” Although male and female probationers did not direr in their cumulative “need” level, significant differences by sex were found in the factors used by the probation officers to arrive at their decision or in the relative weights assigned to them. A multivariate analysis indicates that gender‐role expectations and stereotypes weigh heavily in the officers' decision making and guide the application of treatment. The implications of such gender‐based rehabilitation are drawn and discussed.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Discrimination in the Criminal Courts: Family, Gender, and the Problem of Equal TreatmentSocial Forces, 1987
- Decision making by parole interviewers: The effect of case and interview factors.Law and Human Behavior, 1986
- Gender differences in probation: A case of no differencesJustice Quarterly, 1986
- Legal outcomes and legal agents: Adding another dimension to the sex-sentencing controversy.Law and Human Behavior, 1985
- Methodological Issues in Court ResearchSociological Methods & Research, 1983
- The Attitudes and Decisions of Probation OfficersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 1982
- Sex and Theories of Deviance: Toward a Functional Theory of Deviant Type-ScriptsAmerican Sociological Review, 1977
- The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order CategoriesAmerican Sociological Review, 1970
- Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970
- Factors in the Decision-Making of North Carolina Probation OfficersJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1966