Anatomy of a media event: How arguments clashed in the 2001 human cloning debate
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in New Genetics and Society
- Vol. 22 (1) , 43-59
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677032000069709
Abstract
This paper studies the distinctive role that staged media events play in the public understanding of genetics: they can focus the attention of the media, scientists and the public on the risks and benefits of genetic advances, in our case, cloning; they can accelerate policy changes by exposing scientific, legal and ethical uncertainties; the use of images, metaphors, cliche´s and cultural narratives by scientists and the media engaged in this event can reinforce stereotypical representations of cloning, but can also expose fundamental clashes in arguments about cloning. The media event staged by two fertility experts in 2001 is here analysed as a case study.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Book of Life: How the Completion of the Human Genome Project was Revealed to the PublicHealth: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 2002
- Fictions, fantasies, and fears: The literary foundations of the cl oning debateJournal of Literary Semantics, 2001
- Dolly: Scientific Breakthrough or Frankenstein's Monster? Journalistic and Scientific Metaphors of CloningMetaphor and Symbol, 2000
- The Influence of Popular Cultural Imagery on Public Attitudes towards CloningSociological Research Online, 1999
- What we know and what we don't about cloning and societyNew Genetics and Society, 1999
- Cloning humans, cloning literature: genetics and the imagination deficitNew Genetics and Society, 1999
- Metaphorical reasoning about geneticsInternational Journal of Science Education, 1997
- Public understanding of the new geneticsPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1996
- Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989