Comparison of (S)‐mephenytoin and proguanil oxidation in vitro: contribution of several CYP isoforms

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Aims To compare the oxidative metabolism of (S)-mephenytoin and proguanil in vitro and to determine the involvement of various cytochrome P450 isoforms. Methods The kinetics of the formation of 4′-hydroxymephenytoin and cycloguanil in human liver microsomes from 10 liver samples were determined, and inhibition of formation was studied using specific chemical inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies directed towards specific CYP450 isoforms. Expressed CYP450 enzymes were used to characterize further CYP isoform contribution in vitro. Livers were genotyped for CYP2C19 using PCR amplification of genomic DNA followed by restriction endonuclease digestion. Results All livers were wildtype with respect to CYP2C19, except HLS#5 whose genotype was CYP2C19*1/CYP2C19*2. The Km, Vmax and CLint values for the formation of 4′-hydroxymephenytoin from (S)-mephenytoin and the formation of cycloguanil from proguanil ranged from 50.8 to 51.6 and 43–380 μm, 1.0–13.9 and 0.5–2.5 nmol mg−1 h−1, and 20.2–273.8 and 2.7–38.9 μl h−1 mg−1, respectively. There was a significant association between the Vmax values of cycloguanil and 4′-hydroxymephenytoin formation (rs=0.95, P=0.0004). Cycloguanil formation was inhibited significantly by omeprazole (CYP2C19/3A), troleandomycin (CYP3A), diethyldithiocarbamate (CYP2E1/3A), furafylline (CYP1A2), and (S)-mephenytoin. 4′-Hydroxymephenytoin formation was inhibited significantly by omeprazole, diethyldithiocarbamate, proguanil, furafylline, diazepam, troleandomycin, and sulphaphenazole (CYP2C9). Human CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 monoclonal antibodies did not inhibit the formation of cycloguanil or 4′-hydroxymephenytoin, and cycloguanil was formed by expressed CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 supersomes. However, only expressed CYP2C19 and CYP2C19 supersomes formed 4′-hydroxymephenytoin. Conclusions The oxidative metabolism of (S)-mephenytoin and proguanil in vitro is catalysed by CYPs 2C19 and 1A2, with the significant association between Vmax values suggesting that the predominant enzymes involved in both reactions are similar. However the degree of selectively of both drugs for CYP isoforms needs further investigation, particularly the involvement of CYP3A4 in the metabolism of proguanil. We assert that proguanil may not be a suitable alternative to (S)-mephenytoin as a probe drug for the CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism.