Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study
Top Cited Papers
- 15 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 96 (13) , 4075-4083
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v96.13.4075
Abstract
The associations of cytogenetics with complete remission (CR) rates, overall survival (OS), and outcomes after CR were studied in 609 previously untreated AML patients younger than 56 years old in a clinical trial comparing 3 intensive postremission therapies: intensive chemotherapy, autologous transplantation (ABMT), or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) from matched related donors. Patients were categorized into favorable, intermediate, unfavorable, and unknown cytogenetic risk groups based on pretreatment karyotypes. CR rates varied significantly (P < .0001) among the 4 groups: favorable, 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77%-90%); intermediate, 76% (CI, 71%-81%); unfavorable, 55% (CI, 48%-63%); and unknown, 54% (CI, 33%-74%). There was similar significant heterogeneity of OS (P < .0001), with the estimated relative risk of death from any cause being 1.50 (CI, 1.10-2.05), 3.33 (CI, 2.43-4.55), and 2.66 (CI, 1.59-4.45) for the intermediate, unfavorable, and unknown risk groups, respectively, compared with the favorable group. In multivariate analyses, the effects of cytogenetic risk status on CR rate and OS could not be explained by other patient or disease characteristics. Among postremission patients, survival from CR varied significantly among favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable groups (P = .0003), with significant evidence of interaction (P = .017) between the effects of treatment and cytogenetic risk status on survival. Patients with favorable cytogenetics did significantly better following ABMT and alloBMT than with chemotherapy alone, whereas patients with unfavorable cytogenetics did better with alloBMT. Cytogenetic risk status is a significant factor in predicting response of AML patients to therapy; however, to tighten treatment correlates within genetically defined AML subsets, a significantly larger leukemia cytogenetic database is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy Compared with Autologous or Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in the Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First RemissionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The Importance of Diagnostic Cytogenetics on Outcome in AML: Analysis of 1,612 Patients Entered Into the MRC AML 10 TrialBlood, 1998
- Randomised comparison of addition of autologous bone-marrow transplantation to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission: results of MRC AML 10 trialThe Lancet, 1998
- All-trans-Retinoic Acid in Acute Promyelocytic LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia With t(6;9) (p23;q34):Association With Myelodysplasia, Basophilia, and Initial CD34 Negative ImmunophenotypeAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1997
- Hidden chromosome abnormalities in haematological malignancies detected by multicolour spectral karyotypingNature Genetics, 1997
- Trisomy 11: an association with stem/progenitor cell immunophenotypeBritish Journal of Haematology, 1995
- Autologous or Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation Compared with Intensive Chemotherapy in Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958