Non‐targeted whole genome 250K SNP array analysis as replacement for karyotyping in fetuses with structural ultrasound anomalies: evaluation of a one‐year experience
- 30 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 32 (4) , 362-370
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2948
Abstract
Objective We evaluated both clinical and laboratory aspects of our new strategy offering quantitative fluorescence (QF)‐PCR followed by non‐targeted whole genome 250K single‐nucleotide polymorphism array analysis instead of routine karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with structural anomalies. Methods Upon the detection of structural fetal anomalies, parents were offered a choice between QF‐PCR and 250K single‐nucleotide polymorphism array analysis (QF/array) or QF‐PCR and routine karyotyping (QF/karyo). Results Two hundred twenty fetal samples were included. In 153/220 cases (70%), QF/array analysis was requested. In 35/153 (23%), an abnormal QF‐PCR result was found. The remaining samples were analyzed by array, which revealed clinically relevant aberrations, including two known microdeletions, in 5/118 cases. Inherited copy number variants were detected in 11/118 fetuses, copy number variants with uncertain clinical relevance in 3/118 and homozygous stretches in 2/118. In 67/220 (30%) fetuses, QF/karyo was requested: 23/67 (34%) were abnormal with QF‐PCR, and in 3/67, an abnormal karyotype was found. Conclusion Even though QF/array does not reveal a high percentage of submicroscopic aberrations in fetuses with unselected structural anomalies, it is preferred over QF/karyo, as it provides a whole genome scan at high resolution, without additional tests needed and with a low chance on findings not related to the ultrasound anomalies. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimensionNature Reviews Genetics, 2011
- Copy-number changes in prenatal diagnosisExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2011
- Array technology in prenatal diagnosisSeminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 2011
- Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosisCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Comparison of microarray‐based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimensPrenatal Diagnosis, 2008
- Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridizationGenetics in Medicine, 2006
- Detection of Chromosome Aberrations in the Second Trimester Using Genetic Amniocentesis: Experience During 1995-2004Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformationsJournal of Medical Genetics, 2005
- Changes in the Utilization of Prenatal DiagnosisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies during the second trimester of pregnancy: Their characterization and delineation of defects in pregnancies at riskPrenatal Diagnosis, 1991