A note on the interpretation of results of supplementation trials
- 1 February 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 33 (2) , 333-337
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/33.2.333
Abstract
In a supplementation trial to study the effect of the supplemental treatment on some response variable of interest, the variable is often measured twice from each subject; namely, before (x) and after (y) the trial period. The difference between y and x (Z = y − x) is then computed for each subject. The Z and x values are the primary data for statistical analysis. The objective of the study is to obtain an unbiased estimate of the “average effect” of the supplemental treatment on the response variable. When x is not comparable in the two groups (supplementation versus no supplementation) but x and Z are similarly correlated in the two groups, then an unbiased estimate of the average effect is obtained by the usual method of covariance adjustment of x. However, when x and Z are not similarly correlated in the two groups, a modified method of adjustment of x is needed to obtain an unbiased estimate of the average effect. The modified method is given in this note. Furthermore, the statistical implication of the average effect so obtained is discussed.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Analysis of Data from the “Before-After” Type of ExperimentsAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Interpretation of results of supplementation trials1The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1978
- CONFOUNDING AND EFFECT-MODIFICATIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1974
- The Use of Covariance in Observational StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1969