Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: bridging the divide between doctors and managers
- 23 June 2005
- Vol. 330 (7506) , 1501-1503
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1501
Abstract
Tensions between doctors and managers and the differences between medical and managerial cultures have existed since the earliest provision of organised health care.1 In a resource allocation context, doctors are caricatured as taking the role of patient advocate while managers take the corporate, strategic view. Delivery of efficient (and in the case of the NHS, equitable) health care requires doctors to take responsibility for resources and to consider the needs of populations while managers need to become more outcome and patient centred. One economic approach, called programme budgeting and marginal analysis, has the potential to align the goals of doctors and managers and create common ground between them. We describe how the approach works and why it should be more widely used.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadershipThe Lancet, 2003
- Trends in doctor-manager relationshipsBMJ, 2003
- Kaiser Permanente: a propensity for partnershipBMJ, 2003
- Using PBMA in health care priority setting: description, challenges and experience.2003
- Economics, Public Health and Health Care Purchasing: The Tayside Experience of Programme Budgeting and Marginal AnalysisJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1996
- Clearing the fog on the Tyne: programme budgeting in Newcastle and North Tyneside Health AuthorityHealth Policy, 1995
- Marginal analysis in practice: an alternative to needs assessment for contracting health careBMJ, 1994
- Needs assessment: developing an economic approachHealth Policy, 1993