We Can't Change What We Don't Recognize: Understanding the Special Needs of Gifted Females
- 1 April 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Gifted Child Quarterly
- Vol. 31 (2) , 83-89
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628703100208
Abstract
In this article, an overives of some of the major issues, questions and problems related to gifted females will be presented. These issues include the underachievement of gifted females; creative productivity of females; male dominance in mathematics and science; cultural stereotyping, sex roles and mixed messages; lack of planning; the perfection complex and the imposter syndrome; concerns about counseling and special populations, Research related to the issues of ability, achievement, personality, social and environmental pressures related to gender will be briefly discussed and suggestions for future research directions will be made.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Myth of Female Underachievement: A Reexamination of Sex Differences in Academic UnderachievementAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1984
- Sex Differences in Quantitative SAT Performance: New Evidence on the Differential Coursework HypothesisAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1983
- Advocacy for the Neglected Gifted: FemalesGifted Child Quarterly, 1980
- Academic underachievement, other-direction, and attitudes toward women's roles in bright adolescent females.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978
- Career Development of Gifted WomenGifted Child Quarterly, 1977
- Fear of success in 1965 and 1974: A follow-up study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977
- Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievement, Spatial Visualization and Affective FactorsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1977
- The socialization of achievement orientation in females.Psychological Bulletin, 1973
- Toward An Understanding of Achievement‐Related Conflicts in WomenJournal of Social Issues, 1972
- The onset of academic underachievement in bright children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960