Nuclear quantitative grading by discriminant analysis of renal cell carcinoma samples. A patient survival evaluation
- 1 June 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Pathology
- Vol. 173 (2) , 105-114
- https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1711730206
Abstract
Specimens from 60 cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were graded employing quantitative nuclear data combined with multivariate discriminant analysis. Evaluation of patient survival was analysed with respect to quantitative microscopic and qualitative features. Both morphometric and stereological estimators were used to establish the nuclear size and form pattern of the RCC specimens. Tumoural dedifferentiation paralleled progressive increases in nuclear elongation and in two‐ and, especially, three‐dimensional—mean nuclear volume (MNV)—size parameters. Using stepwise discriminant analysis, 85‐0 per cent of the specimens were correctly classified when differentiating grade 2 and 3 tumours. It is concluded that simple and realistic estimates of MNV are the best discriminator for objective grading in patients with RCC. Univariate survival analysis demonstrated the important significance of several features such as MNV, clinical stage, and nuclear discriminant and histopathological tumour grades. Nuclear form factor PE, area, and perimeter were also significant. A prognosis study based on the Cox model using a stepwise selection of parameters showed that only MNV has an independent prognostic role when examining all investigated quantitative parameters. The clinical stage was the best prognostic feature when all quantitative and qualitative characteristics were included in the analysis.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Histomorphometry of Normal and Abnormal Endometrial SamplesInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology, 1993
- Morphometrically estimated variation in nuclear sizeUrological Research, 1990
- Prognostic value of morphometry in papillary thyroid carcinomaHuman Pathology, 1989
- Renal carcinoma.Reevaluation of prognostic factorsCancer, 1988
- The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancerCancer, 1985
- Stereological estimation of the volume‐weighted mean volume of arbitrary particles observed on random sections*Journal of Microscopy, 1985
- Nuclear size and shape of epithelial cells from the endometrium: lack of value as a criterion for differentiation between normal, hyperplastic, and malignant conditions.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1985
- Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1982
- Renal Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Survival and Late RecurrenceJournal of Urology, 1981
- Renal Adenocarcinoma in Young Adults: Survival and Variables Affecting PrognosisJournal of Urology, 1981