To what extent can children with autism understand desire?
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Development and Psychopathology
- Vol. 7 (1) , 151-169
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579400006398
Abstract
Previous studies of theory of mind abilities in young people with autism have found that their understanding of false belief is specifically impaired, but that simple aspects of desire are understood in line with mental age. We explored the possibility that more complex aspects of desire (in which comparison of goals with outcomes is not a sufficient strategy) are not understood by children with autism. In two experiments, we found that these children were specifically impaired in understanding desire satisfaction and desire change, when compared with children with mental handicap and normal 4-6-year-olds. Although there was some evidence that understanding of desires may be easier for individuals with autism than understanding false belief, it would appear that they have difficulties in understanding both epistemic and volitional mental states.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- ToMM, ToBY, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificityPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- Annotation: Current Psychological Theories of Autism: The “Theory of Mind” Account and Rival TheoriesJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1994
- Young Children's Understanding of Fact Beliefs versus Value BeliefsChild Development, 1990
- The infant's theory of self-propelled objectsCognition, 1990
- Beyond sensorimotor functioning: early communicative and play development of children with Down syndromePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1990
- Multiple Comparison ProceduresJournal of Educational Statistics, 1989
- Autistic children's understanding of seeing, knowing and believingBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1988
- Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?Cognition, 1985
- Young children's coordination of motive and outcome in judgements of satisfaction and moralityBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1984
- Development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes, and passive movementsBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1980