High‐rise housing reconsidered: Some research and policy‐implications
- 12 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Housing Studies
- Vol. 6 (2) , 83-95
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039108720699
Abstract
High‐rise housing estates are generally seen as a problem. High‐rise blocks in the social sector on the edge of the city are implicitly written off. Although in the Netherlands high‐rise blocks are overrepresented among ‘problem’ blocks, high‐rise housing itself can not be classified as problematic. Evidence suggests that even in the case of nearly identical blocks, located in the same neighbourhood or housing market area, performance and social conditions differ. This article focuses on the ‘well functioning’ high‐rise blocks in the social sector, not on the ‘ill functioning’. Research providing a comparison of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ high‐rise blocks in two middle‐sized towns in the Netherlands is used to consider what can be learnt about the prospects and potential of social high‐rise housing in the near future.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Upgrading of large-scale housing estates in The NetherlandsJournal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1989
- UPGRADING AND DOWNGRADING OF URBAN AREASTijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 1989
- Changes in high-rise housing: The role of high-rise housing complexes in local housing marketsJournal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1987
- High-rise housing estates and the concentration of povertyJournal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1986
- A model for the analysis of the decline of postwar housingInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1986
- Architecture, Interaction, and Social ControlEnvironment and Behavior, 1971
- Fear and the House-as-Haven in the Lower ClassJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1966