The Triservice anaesthetic apparatus
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 42 (10) , 1101-1104
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb05178.x
Abstract
Sixty male patients undergoing limb surgery were anaesthetised using a drawover technique with the Triservice apparatus. They were randomly allocated to receive trichloroethylene and one of three other volatile agents (halothane, enflurane or isoflurane) after thiopentone induction. Signs of inadequate anaesthesia were noted. The incidence of such signs was not significantly different in the three groups. Similarly, no qualitative difference could be demonstrated in the immediate recovery, but the recovery time was significantly shorter with enflurane.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Ideal agent for drawover anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1986
- Induction and recovery characteristics of isoflurane and halothane anaesthesia for short outpatient operations in childrenAnaesthesia, 1985
- A comparison of alfentanil, halothane and enflurane for day‐case gynaecological surgeryAnaesthesia, 1985
- Recovery from day‐case anaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1985
- Self‐administered isoflurane in labourAnaesthesia, 1985
- Isoflurane: the need for new volatile agentsAnaesthesia, 1983
- Anaesthesia during the Falklands campaignAnaesthesia, 1983
- A comparison of halothane and enflurance (ethrane) for out-patient dental anaesthesiaBritish Dental Journal, 1979
- EditorialAnaesthesia, 1979
- Halothane?trichlorethylene and airAnaesthesia, 1968