Comparing Cox and parametric models in clinical studies
- 14 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (23) , 3597-3610
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1592
Abstract
Parametric models are only occasionally used in the analysis of clinical studies of survival although they may offer advantages over Cox's model. In this paper, we report experiences that we have made fitting parametric models to data sets from different clinical trials mainly performed at the Vienna University Medical School. We emphasize the role of residuals for discriminating among candidate models and judging their goodness of fit. The effect of misspecification of the baseline distribution on parameter estimates and testing has been explored. The results from parametric analyses have always been contrasted with those from Cox's model. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- New Residuals for Cox Regression and Their Application to Outlier ScreeningBiometrics, 1999
- Prognosis in lung cancer: physicians' opinions compared with outcome and a predictive model.Thorax, 1996
- A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure timeControlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residualsBiometrika, 1994
- Assessing time‐by‐covariate interactions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functionsStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Parametric extrapolation of survival estimates with applications to quality of life evaluation of treatmentsControlled Clinical Trials, 1993
- Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression modelBiometrika, 1982
- The Efficiency of Cox's Likelihood Function for Censored DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977
- The asymptotic information in censored survival dataBiometrika, 1977