Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using HexabrixTM or RenografinTM in high-risk patients
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 61 (15) , 1334-1337
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)91179-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiographic Contrast Agents — A PerspectiveNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Use of conventional and newer radiographic contrast agents in cardiac angiographyProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1986
- The Pharmacology of Intravascular Radiocontrast MediaAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1986
- Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: A randomized double-blind studyAmerican Heart Journal, 1986
- Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1985
- Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 Following Left Ventriculography and Coronary ArteriographyInvestigative Radiology, 1984
- The haemodynamic effects of left ventriculography in coronary artery disease and mitral valve disease: a comparison of high and low osmolality contrast mediaEuropean Heart Journal, 1984
- Hemodynamic changes induced by cardiac angiography with ioxaglate: Comparison with diatrizoateJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): Advantages over standard ionic agentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.Radiology, 1982