Peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: Relevance for research in clinical neuropsychology
- 1 November 1992
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Vol. 14 (6) , 976-980
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639208402548
Abstract
This comment serves to discuss the major findings of a recently published crossdisciplinary investigation of the peer review process, with specific emphasis upon: (1) the contributions of neuropsychologists to our understanding of this complex phenomenon; and (b) the design and preliminary results of a recently completed investigation of the reliability of the peer review process for the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Agreement among reviewers of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Reflections from the peer review mirrorBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- The process of peer review: Unanswered questionsBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Journal availability and the quality of published researchBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Toward openness and fairness in the review processBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Peer review: An unflattering pictureBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- On peer review: “We have met the enemy and he is us”Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982