Nuclear DNA does not reconcile ‘rocks’ and ‘clocks’ in Neoaves: a comment on Ericson et al .
- 27 March 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by The Royal Society in Biology Letters
- Vol. 3 (3) , 257-260
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0611
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Paleontological Evidence to Date the Tree of LifeMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2006
- Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossilsBiology Letters, 2006
- A Mitogenomic Timescale for Birds Detects Variable Phylogenetic Rates of Molecular Evolution and Refutes the Standard Molecular ClockMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2006
- Early Penguin Fossils, Plus Mitochondrial Genomes, Calibrate Avian EvolutionMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2006
- Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the CretaceousNature, 2005
- The rise of birds and mammals: are microevolutionary processes sufficient for macroevolution?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2004
- r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clockBioinformatics, 2003
- Divergence Time and Evolutionary Rate Estimation with Multilocus DataSystematic Biology, 2002
- Calibration of Avian Molecular ClocksMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2001