Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Instrumentation
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 20 (18) , 1979-1983
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199509150-00003
Abstract
A biomechanical study was designed to assess relative construct stabilities of modern anterior thorecolumbar instrumentations in a calf spine model with an anterior and middle column defect. The purpose is to compare the biomechanical stability of various anterior fixation devices in an unstable calf spine model. Modern types of anterior thoracolumbar instrumentations evolved to either rods or plates. Biomechanical properties and comparative studies of these instrumentations are lacking. Twenty fresh calf spines (L2-L5) were used for the biomechanical tests. L2-L5) vertebrae were used to attach the loading and base frames, respectively. Specimens underwent nondestructive biomechanical tests performed using a three-dimensional motion measuring system. In each specimen, three different cases were tested; Intact spine, anterior fixation with an interbody graft after total discectomy and end-plate excision of L3-L4 disc, anterior fixation only with out the graft. Four antieror fixation, University Anteior Plating System, the Kaneda device, the Z-plate, and Taxes Scottish Rite Hospital system were used. Each device was tested on Five specimens. A polymethyl methacrylate block was grafting, and a fixation device was implanted with axial compression. Rotational angles of the L3-L4 segment stabilized by a fixation device and graft were normalized by the corresponding angles of the intact specimen to study the overall stabilizing effects. With the interbody graft and fixation devices, all showed significant stabilizing effects in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. All devices restored axial rotation stability to intact specimen, but only the Kaneda device restored the torsional stability beyond the intact specimen. No statistical differences in stabilizing effects in axial rotation were found between any of the tested devices. When the graft was removed,. the Kaneda device significantly decreased the motions in all directions compared with the intact motions whereas the University plato decreased the motions in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. The Texas Scottish Rite Hospital system was found to reduce the flexion and lateral bending motions significantly, and Z-plate decreased lateral bending motions only. Stablizing effects of the interbody graft were significant in lateral bendings for all devices. Additionally, the significant stabilizing role of the graft was noted in flexion and extension in Z-plate only. The graft did not significantly reduce the axial rotation motion in any instrumentations. Modern anterior instrumentations for the thoracolumbar spine, such as the Kaneda device, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital system, Z-plate, and University plate, restored the stability in all motions when an interbody graft was inserted. The stability of fixalion devices revealed that the Kaneda device is the best, particularly in restoring the torsioral stability. The information on the relative stability provided by different instrumentations should help the spine surgeon in choosing the appropriate instrumentation for the particular circumstance.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: