The impact of perceived medical dominance on the workplace satisfaction of Australian and British nurses
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 21 (1) , 172-183
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21010172.x
Abstract
Current literature on the sociology of health views medical dominance as a structural feature of the health division of labour, and a body of literature has developed exploring the structural components contributing to the subordination of the allied health professions. In this paper, nursing literature describing the nature and source of nurses' perceptions, complaints and dissatisfactions with their profession, and sociological analyses of the position of nurses within the structure of the health care delivery system, were employed to provide a framework for assessing the degree to which structural medical dominance of the nursing profession impinges on nurses' perceptions of dominance and how these perceptions affect nurses' workplace satisfaction. A 69-item questionnaire covering aspects of doctor-nurse, doctor-patient, nurse-patient and nurse-hospital administration relationships was developed. One-hundred and thirty-three Australian nurses and 108 British nurses completed the questionnaire, in which they ranked their own level of professional satisfaction and the level of satisfaction they perceived doctors to experience. Results indicated that Australian and British nurses were not only dissatisfied with many aspects of their work environment, such as their pay and working conditions, but also experienced dissatisfaction with their professional status while perceiving the medical profession to be highly satisfied. British nurses were significantly more dissatisfied with their own profession and perceived the medical profession to be more authoritarian than did Australian nurses. No difference between Australian and British nurses' perceptions of degree of medical autonomy was found. The implications of nurses' perceived discrepancy in workplace satisfaction between nurses and doctors in the delivery of health care are discussed in terms of the structural barriers created by medical dominance. Recommendations for the training of nurses and the implications of the findings for nurse practitioners are made, together with suggestions for further research.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The poverty of professionalization: a critical analysis of strategies for the occupational advancement of nursingJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1992
- Sources and consequences of satisfaction and dissatisfaction in nursing: findings from a national sampleInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 1991
- Two Requirements for Job Contentment: Autonomy and Social IntegrationImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1990
- Medical Discourse on Contemporary Nurse Education: An Ideological AnalysisJournal of Sociology, 1990
- Changing times changing paradigm (1): from hospital training and college education in AustraliaNurse Education Today, 1989
- Limitations on the Use of Scales in Psychiatric ResearchAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1988
- How nurses get their way: Power strategies in nursingJournal of Professional Nursing, 1987
- The Vocabulary of Complaints: Nursing, Professionalism and Job ContextJournal of Sociology, 1986
- Is nursing any business of doctors? A simple guide to the "nursing process".BMJ, 1984
- Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: A test of five hypothesesSocial Science & Medicine, 1982